The Department of Earth Sciences has received the Athena SWAN Bronze Award.
Athena SWAN is a national scheme to promote women's careers in science, technology, engineering, maths and medicine (STEMM). Its Bronze, Silver and Gold awards celebrate good practice in recruiting, retaining and promoting women in those subject areas within Higher Education.
The scheme is managed by the Equality Challenge Unit (ECU), and is funded by ECU, the Research Councils UK (RCUK), the Royal Society, the Biochemical Society and the Department of Health. The Charter evolved from work between the Athena Project and the Scientific Women's Academic Network (SWAN) and was launched in June 2005 at the Institute of Physics. The membership has steadily grown since then, and so has the number of award holders Nationally, Athena SWAN activity has significantly increased following the link between Athena SWAN awards and research funding. In 2011, the Chief Medical Officer announced that the National Institute for Health Research would only expect to shortlist medical schools for biomedical research centre and unit funding if the school holds a Silver Athena SWAN award. In January 2013, the Research Councils UK (RCUK) unveiled its new Statement of Expectations for Equality and Diversity, expecting those in receipt of Research Council funding to provide evidence of commitment to equality and diversity with participation in Athena SWAN specifically mentioned as one piece of such evidence. It may be expected that other funders (such as the Royal Society and charities) will follow suit.
The Charter has 10 principles at its core, the benefits of which include retention of highly valued female staff, access to a network of contacts, and external recognition of positive action already taken.
The University of Cambridge was a founder member of Athena SWAN Charter and the University won its first award in the inaugural round of March 2006.
Since then, the University has successfully renewed its Bronze Athena SWAN award in 2009 and 2012. In 2014, the University successfully applied for a Silver Athena SWAN award.
The Department of Earth Sciences
Athena SWAN committee:
|David Hodell (Chair)||firstname.lastname@example.org||30270|
Please contact anyone from the above list if you have any information, suggestions or complaints on equality related issues.
In April 2016, the Department received the Athena SWAN Bronze Award.
In December 2015, the Department of Earth Sciences submitted an application for a Bronze Award:
Part of the submission includes an Action Plan covering the next three years outlining steps, procedures and events to support our Bronze Award:
The Action Plan can also be viewed in Mind Map format:
Part of the submission included a Staff Survey, undertaken in January 2014
Here is the Survey Summary:
Staff Survey Results Summary
The Department of Earth Sciences conducted a survey for all staff and post-graduate students between 13th and 31st January 2014.
The response rate was 78% (194 responses out of 250 people), which is significantly better than that of other higher education institutions and we thank everyone who took the time to complete the survey.
The survey consisted of 74 questions which, in most cases, asked for responses to a range of questions by selecting one of five options:
- Strongly agree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Strongly disagree
Below is a summary of the headline results, focused on the five questions that drew the most positive responses, the most neutral responses and those with the highest proportion of negative responses.
The five questions that received the highest percentage of positive responses (strongly agree and agree) were:
My immediate line manager / supervisor treats me with respect (85.0%) Q29
I am treated with fairness and respect in the Department of Earth Sciences (84.7%) Q51
I know where to find information about training and development opportunities (83.0%) Q12
There is effective cooperation between people within my immediate work area / research team (81.7%) Q24
I am satisfied with my working environment (80.9%) Q1
The five questions that received the highest percentage of neutral responses (neither agree nor disagree) were:
I am happy with the University's childcare provision (64.8%) Q43
The career development / promotion processes at the University are fair (46.4%) Q15
My probation was well managed (45.1%) Q6
I am satisfied with the support from the Department in managing stress (e.g. information about the Staff Counseling service, staff training and Occupational Health) (42.6%) Q34
I am happy with the redeployment support I received from the University (42.3%) Q19
The five questions that received the highest percentage of negative responses (disagree and strongly disagree) were:
I think there are sufficient opportunities for my career progression at the University (30.2%) Q14
There is effective cooperation between the Bullard site and the Downing site sections of the Department (29.6%) Q26
I expect to be working at the University of Cambridge in five years’ time (29.3%) Q17
I receive regular and constructive informal feedback on my performance (26.8%) Q10
Considering my duties and responsibilities, I feel my pay is fair (22.0%) Q48
Effect of explanatory factors
Gender, age group, staff group and site were interrelated. The Bullard Laboratories Site had fewer assistants (almost all assistants work at the Downing site) and staff were more likely to be younger. Furthermore, academics were more likely to be male.
Staff group and site were found to be the main factors associated with participants’ ordinal responses. Assistants and academic-related staff were less likely to give positive responses compared with the academic staff, postdoc/JRF and postgraduate students. In the majority of questions, staff in the Bullard Laboratories Site (including BPI) were more likely to give a more positive response compared with staff in the Downing Site. Gender was found to be a significant factor in 4 questions (Q24, Q44, Q55 and Q57), see below. There was no evidence that the odds of a positive response were influenced by age group after adjusting for gender, staff group and site.
The survey showed that academics were much more likely to be male than female. Gender was a significant factor in 4 questions:
There is effective cooperation between people within work area/research team Q24, with females giving a significantly more negative response.
It is important that meetings / seminars in the Department of Earth Sciences take place in core hours (e.g. 0930 to 1630) to enable those with caring responsibilities to attend Q44, with females giving a significantly more positive response.
I would feel able to report bullying or harassment without worrying that it would have a negative impact on me Q55, with female staff more likely to give a more negative response than male staff.
I feel able to speak up and give my views on the way things are done Q57, with female staff more likely to give a negative response.